domingo, 25 de janeiro de 2015

Zeppelins

"England is no longer an island." (manchete do Daily Mail, 1909)

Balloons had been used in wars prior to the First World War, notably by the Americans in the civil war and the French during the siege of Paris in 1870. This technology had been advanced by the development of dirigibles - cigar shaped airships with frames, containing many gas balloons. Powered with multiple engines, these craft could be flown in specific directions rather than just follow the direction of the wind.

Germany had two dirigible manufacturers, the Schutte-Lanz Company, and the larger and better known Zeppelin Company. The latter was headed by Ferdinand von Zeppelin, the world's foremost designer of airships. To this day his name remains synonymous with dirigibles in general.

Airships of his design had already proven themselves capable of flying as far as England and back. This fact was not lost on the Allies, who from the very outset targeted the airship sheds. It was also not lost on the British public, where rumours and reported sightings of Zeppelins were frequent, though unfounded, throughout 1914.

At the outbreak of the war the German army had six operational dirigibles, and the navy had one. The army was quick to experiment with them - bombing Liege and Antwerp - despite the fact that at this stage no specially designed aerial bombs existed. But the army's initial experience was not encouraging - they lost three airships in the first months of the war to anti aircraft fire.

Despite this the navy was very enthusiastic. They saw the Zeppelin as a solution to their reconnaissance problems. If the army traditionally used the cavalry for reconnaissance, the navy traditionally used the light cruiser. Germany had very few such ships, and an airship was viewed as being cheaper and less vulnerable.

Under the command of Korvettenkapitan Peter Strasser the navy quickly acquired more airships. Throughout 1914 these were used for reconnaissance patrols over the North Sea, but the German Admiralty was pressing for permission to use them for attacks against England. The Kaiser, somewhat reluctantly, granted such permission and on the 19th of January the Germans carried out the first Zeppelin raid against Britain, killing two and injuring sixteen.

This was the first of many raids, which continued at a rate of about two per month, in parallel with the continuing reconnaissance patrols. The German Admiralty was very enthusiastic about the results, and asked for permission to bomb London. This was only granted by the Kaiser after a series of raids by French bombers on German cities. On the 31st of May 1915 the first raid was carried out against London, killing seven and injuring thirty five.

The most successful Zeppelin raid on London in the entire war was on the 8th of September 1915. This raid caused more than half a million pounds of damage, almost all of it from the one Zeppelin, the L13, which managed to bomb central London. This single raid caused more than half the material damage caused by all the raids against Britain in 1915.

On the night of 6-7 June 1915 Rex Warneford, a lieutenant in the RNAS, flying a Morane-Saulnier, was on a bombing mission against the Zeppelin sheds at Evere. When he spotted a Zeppelin returning from a bombing raid against London he decided to attack it. He tried shooting his carbine at it, his only armament, but he was driven off by the Zeppelin's defensive machine guns.

The airship began climbing, leaving the little plane behind, but Warneford, unbeknown to the Zeppelin crew, continued the pursuit, climbing slowly over two hours to an altitude of 13,000 feet. At this stage the airship began to descend in the direction of Brussels, and seizing his opportunity Warneford, now above the Zeppelin, dived towards it and from about two hundred feet above he dropped his six bombs on its roof.

The resultant explosion destroyed the Zeppelin, and almost destroyed Warneford's fragile monoplane.

He was forced to put the plane down, behind enemy lines, but he managed to make sufficient emergency repairs to take off again and return to his base. LZ 37 was the first Zeppelin brought down by an airplane.

Warneford was awarded the Victoria Cross by the British, and the Knight's Cross of the Legion d'Honneur by the French, but his triumph was short-lived. He was killed ten days later in a flying accident.

This was an isolated incident. Throughout the remainder of 1915 the Zeppelins raided London frequently, and with impunity. They flew too high for most planes, and when they were intercepted by aircraft the ammunition in use at the time had little effect. Despite this impunity the material effect of the raids, with the exception of L13's success, was relatively slight.

Navigation was very primitive, and as the war progressed the British use of blackouts made it even harder. Bomb aiming was far from accurate. It is estimated that only 10% of the bombs dropped from Zeppelins actually hit their target. The psychological impact of these raids, however, was enough to cause the British to tie up 12 squadrons on home defence.

The Germans also bombed Paris. The first raid was on 21st of March, when two Zeppelins caused 23 deaths and injured 30. Although the Zeppelins continued to raid Paris, London was actually a preferred and easier target. The nearest Zeppelin base to Paris was at Metz, which meant flying close to 320 km (200 miles) over French territory each way, giving the defending airforce and anti-aircraft guns much more time to organize.

Raids against London had to cover nearly twice the distance, but most of the approach was over friendly territory and the sea. Paris was also protected by barrage balloons, a measure only taken by the British later in the war.

- - -
The Zeppelin attacks had a profound psychological impact on the Allies. The Germans were ordered, under the treaty of Versailles, to hand over all their airships, but their crews preferred to destroy as many of them as they could.

The need to tie up numerous squadron in home defence can be marked as the Zeppelin's greatest achievement, for as a weapon of war they proved themselves unsatisfactory. Of the 115 Zeppelins employed by the Germans, 53 were destroyed and a further 24 were too damaged to be operational. Strasser's crews suffered a 40% loss rate. The cost of constructing those 115 Zeppelins was approximately five times the cost of the damage they inflicted.


Fonte:
http://www.firstworldwar.com/airwar/bombers_zeppelins.htm

Mais:
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/great_yarmouth_remember_air_raid_victims_1_1183124

http://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxwrrqPyqsnIeFBlRVlnUmhia0k

domingo, 11 de janeiro de 2015

Darwinism

Darwinism and World War One

(Lita Cosner)

The evolutionary ideas of Charles Darwin (1809-1882) destructively influenced many of the Western world's leaders in the early 20th century. In particular, intellectuals in Germany were among the earliest to embrace Darwinism enthusiastically, and to apply its concept of the survival of the fittest to human society. That is, they applied the subtitle of On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859). The most infamous result of this was the Holocaust, but social Darwinism was also a major influence in the events leading up to World War One.

In the decades leading up to World War One, intellectuals embraced Darwinism and its ethical implications as a welcome alternative to Christian belief and ethics. Ernst Haeckel (1834-1919), the most famous German Darwinist of the time, and notorious forger of embryo diagrams, believed that evolution would "bring forth a complete revolution in the entire world view of humanity." He argued that Darwinism required the abandonment of Christian morals.

Until the advent of Darwinism, the sanctity of human life was taken for granted in European law and thought. But many German intellectuals began to argue that some had a greater right to life than others, namely, those who are deemed more valuable to society. This inequality was mainly based on race, but the Darwinists argued that there were inferior individuals within a race as well. For instance, zoologist and politician Karl Vogt (1817-1895) argued that a mentally handicapped child was closer in value to an ape than to his own parents. It should thus not be surprising that the world's first eugenics society was founded in Germany, promoting the concept founded by Darwin's cousin Francis Galton (1822-1911).

German social Darwinists were enamoured with the vision of the "master race", which in their mind was the Nordic or Germanic race. Eugenicist Alfred Ploetz (1860-1940) coined the term "racial hygiene" (Rassenhygiene), and later welcomed the Nazis as the ones who would put this into practice. While the belief in German superiority led the Nazis to exterminate "undesirable" individuals, during WW1 German Darwinists used the same idea to justify war on states which they deemed inferior. They believed that the destiny of the master race was to dominate or eliminate "inferior" races, and the most obvious way to accomplish this was through war. In their view, all races and states were in competition for survival, and those who would not wage war would perish. In other words "war is inevitable and peace is merely an armistice in the continuous battle between races and groups for survival."

The concept of Lebensraum or "living space" was one of the justifications for the Germans in both World Wars to take over their neighbouring countries. While Germany was not actually overcrowded, they believed that since one side or the other was always advancing, "without war, inferior or decaying races would easily choke the growth of healthy budding elements, and a universal decadence would follow." Max Weber emphasized this racial competition:

"Our descendants will not hold us responsible primarily for the kind of economic organization that we pass on to them, but rather for the extent of elbow-room [Ellbogenraum], that we obtain through struggle and leave behind."

Interestingly, German Darwinists were divided about whether war was beneficial for the master race. Some were pacifists, including Haeckel, because they believed that war would kill off mainly the best members of the master race, but anthropologist Otto Ammon (1842-1916) believed that war was the only way to test which nation was stronger and to grant victory to the fittest opponent. Of course, there was the problem of undesirable individuals in the German population as well; Ploetz suggested sending them to the front lines so they would be killed before those who were deemed to be more fit.

Because of this view of war as an evolutionary instrument, the German leaders regarded war as a desirable option, even though they could not be sure of a victory. There was also a fatalistic element; they believed that it was their destiny and that they were fulfilling their "preordained role in the development of the world."

Some argue that because Darwin did not directly apply the principles of social Darwinism, the term, and its connection to evolutionary thought, is invalid. But Darwin himself said that killing in the animal kingdom was a way for evolution to progress:

"It may be difficult, but we ought to admire the savage instinctive hatred of the queen-bee, which urges her to instantly destroy the young queens her daughters as soon as born, or to perish herself in the combat; for undoubtedly this is for the good of the community; and maternal love and maternal hatred, though the latter fortunately is most rare, is all the same to the inexorable principle of natural selection."

Darwin simply was reluctant to apply this principle to humans, but the German social Darwinists did not share his disinclination. While there were other factors that caused World War 1, the German leadership's universal belief in social Darwinism and its anti-Christian ethical system justified their militarism and made it into a moral good.


Fonte:
http://creation.com/darwinism-and-world-war-one

Mais:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9n900e80R30
http://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxwrrqPyqsnIbElKNF9ZdU5mdU0

domingo, 4 de janeiro de 2015

Os últimos dias de Santa Sangre

Pessoas atentas observaram estarrecidas quando o conflito desencadeado em 14 atingiu níveis de destruição material e moral até então impensáveis. Não poucos acharam estar diante de mais uma guerra, instituição muito velha - por volta de 2300 a.C. Sargão da Acádia promovia ferozes combates, multidões de mortos caídos pelo solo do Crescente Fértil. Mas daquela vez havia algo diferente. Era o início do choque da mentalidade século XIX com os avanços técnicos que mudariam para sempre a arte de despachar tropas inimigas.

Não demorou para que os violentos atritos provocassem receios apocalípticos. Diz o Evangelho de Mateus, 24:6-7:

"E ouvireis de guerras e de rumores de guerras; olhai, não vos assusteis, porque é mister que isso tudo aconteça, mas ainda não é o fim.
Porquanto se levantará nação contra nação, e reino contra reino, e haverá fomes, e pestes, e terremotos, em vários lugares."


Para os mais devotos não restava dúvida. A consumação dos tempos chegara.

Já em 1915 o inquieto pensador austríaco Karl Kraus, sob o impacto das atrocidades que se acumulavam, começou a escrever a sátira que é geralmente considerada sua obra-prima, a estranha peça Os Últimos Dias Da Humanidade.

E por falar em estranho, tem um filme - ruim - do diretor chileno Alejandro Jodorowsky, Santa Sangre, em que aparece uma musiquinha de temática apocalíptica, e por algum obscuro motivo passei a associá-la a imagens da luta deflagrada em 14. E desde então ficou na minha cabeça uma mistura bizarra de Grande Guerra, Kraus, Jodorowsky e fim do mundo. Vejam e digam se estou maluco:



El fin del mundo se acerca ya

Toda esperanza se acabará

Ya las señales se están cumpliendo

Se están cumpliendo como escrito está

Um aviso aos mais distraídos: o mundo não acabou.



Mais:
http://thelastdaysofmankind.com
http://corior.blogspot.com/2006/02/revisionismo-e-mentiras-das.html